Boundary singularity for
fractional elliptic and parabolic problems

Young Researcher’s Workshop on Nonlocal PDEs and Applications.
Universidad de Granada
October 27, 2022.

David Gómez-Castro

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Co-authors

Juan Luis Vázquez

U. Autónoma de Madrid, Real Academia de Ciencias

Nicola Abatangelo

U. Bologna

Hardy Chan

U. Basel

Fractional Laplacian in \(\mathbb R^d\)

Fractional Laplacian

\[ (-\Delta)^s u (x) = \frac{C(d,s)}2 \int_{\mathbb R^d } \frac{2u(x) - u(x+y) - u(x-y)}{|y|^{d+2s}} d y. \]

The popular choice is \[ {C(d,s)} = \left( \int_{\mathbb R^d} \frac{1 - \cos \omega_1}{|\omega|^{d+2s}} d \omega\right)^{-1} \]

Equivalent definitions (up-to ten (Kwasnicki, 2017))

  • The unique operator such that

    \[ \mathcal F[ (-\Delta)^s u ] = |\xi|^{2s} \mathcal F[u] \]

    i.e. the spectral fractional power of \(-\Delta\).

  • The infinitesimal generator of a Lévy process \(X_h\), characterised by “long jumps”

    \[ (-\Delta)^s u (x) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{ \mathbb E[ f(x) - f(x - X_h) ] }{ h } \]

The Riesz potential

\[ \mathcal I_{\alpha} [u] (x) = C(d, \alpha) \int_{\mathbb R^d} \frac{u(y)}{|x-y|^{d-\alpha}} dy. \]

It is defined for \(0 < \alpha < d\).

It is known that with the right constant \[ \mathcal F[ \mathcal I_{\alpha} u ] = |\xi|^{-\alpha} \mathcal F[u] \]

Thus, \[ \mathcal I_{2s} = \Big( (-\Delta)^s \Big)^{-1} \]

All of the above works on tempered functions, in particular \[ u(x) \to 0, \qquad \text{ as } |x| \to \infty. \]

Laplace equation

\[ \begin{cases} (-\Delta)^s u (x) = f(x) & \textrm{for all } x \in \mathbb R^d \\ u(x) \to 0 & \textrm{as } |x| \to \infty \end{cases} \]

Then when \(d > 2s\) we can recover through the Riesz potential \[ u(x) = C(d,s) \int_{\mathbb R^d} \frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{d-2s}} dy. \]

For any \(d, 2s\) we can also find this solution by the minisation of the energy functional

\[ J(u) = \frac 1 2 \int_{\mathbb R^d} \int_{\mathbb R^d } \frac{|u(x) - u(y)|^2}{|x-y|^{d+2s}} dx \, dy - \int_\Omega f u \]

Regularity: (Caffarelli & Silvestre, 2007) extension

The principal value

Notice that \[\begin{align*} \int_{ \mathbb R^d \setminus B_{\varepsilon} (0) } &\frac{ 2u(x) - u(x+y) - u(x-y) }{|y|^{d+2s}} dy \\ &= 2\int_{ \mathbb R^d \setminus B_{\varepsilon} (0) } \frac{ u(x) - u(y)}{|x-y|^{d+2s}} dy \\ \end{align*}\]

Thus, it makes sense to define \[\begin{equation*} \mathrm{P.V.}\int_{ \mathbb R^d } = \lim_{\varepsilon \to 0} \int_{ \mathbb R^d \setminus B_{\varepsilon} (0) } \end{equation*}\]

Numerics

There are both Finite Difference schemes \[ (-\Delta)^s_h u(x) = \sum_{i \in \mathbb Z^d} \omega_{i-j} (u(x) - u(x+ih)) \]

Some choice of weights for \(d = 1\) is given in (Huang & Oberman, 2014).

See also (Del Teso, Endal & Jakobsen, 2018)

Finite Element schemes are also possible. The un-bounded domain is tricky.

Fractional LaplacianS
in bounded domains

Restricted fractional Laplacian

Singular integral operator: \[ (-\Delta)^s_{\mathrm {RFL}} u (x)= C(d,s) \, \mathrm{P.V.}\int_{ \mathbb R^d } \frac{u(x) - u(y)}{|x-y|^{d+2s}} \; dy. \]

If we work only in \(\Omega\), we must prescribe \(u\) in \(\Omega^c = \mathbb R^d \setminus \Omega\).

Spectral fractional Laplacian

Operational power. \[ -\Delta \varphi_m = \lambda_m \varphi_m \textrm{ in } \Omega, \qquad \varphi_m = 0 \textrm{ on } \partial \Omega. \]

one defines \[ u(x) = \sum_{m=1}^{+\infty} {u_m} \varphi_m(x) \qquad \longmapsto \qquad (-\Delta)_{\mathrm{SFL}}^s u (x) = \sum_{m=1}^{+\infty} \lambda_m^s u_m \varphi_m (x). \]

The “boundary condition” is \(u = 0\) on \(\partial \Omega\).

Censored fractional Laplacian (CFL)

For \(s > \frac 1 2\) \[\begin{equation} \tag{CFL} (-\Delta)^s_{\mathrm{CFL}} u (x) = C(d,s) \, \mathrm{P.V.} \int_{ \Omega } \frac{u(x) - u(y)}{|x-y|^{n+2s}} \; dy, \end{equation}\]

We do not integrate over \(\Omega^c\), so it makes sense to pick simply \(u=0\) on \(\partial\Omega.\)

Laplace equation

\[ \begin{dcases} \mathcal L u = f & \Omega \\ u = 0 & \partial \Omega \text{ or } \mathbb R^d \setminus \overline \Omega \\ \end{dcases} \]

We observe

  • \(\mathcal L = (-\Delta)^s_{\mathrm{RFL}}, (-\Delta)^s_{\mathrm{CFL}}\) are sub-differentials of energies \[ J(u) = \int_A \int_A \frac{|u(x) - u(y)|^2 }{|x-y|^{d+2s}} dx \, dy. \]

  • \(\mathcal L = (-\Delta)^s_{\mathrm{SFL}}\) is just a power.

    The inverse is naturally \((-\Delta_\Omega)^{-s}\), and in works between “powers” of \(H_0^1(\Omega)\).

Self-adjoint compact operators. Furthermore \(\lambda_1 > 0\).

Nice theory of energy solutions.

Higher regularity: RFL (Ros-Oton & Serra, 2014), CFL (Fall & Ros-Oton, 2021)

Green kernels

The solution of the Laplace equation \[ \begin{dcases} \mathcal L u = f & \Omega \\ u = 0 & \partial \Omega \text{ or } \mathbb R^d \setminus \overline \Omega \\ \end{dcases} \]

Allows us to define \(\mathrm G : L^2 (\Omega) \to L^2(\Omega)\) we can represent it by a kernel \[ u(x) = \mathrm G[f] (x) = \int_\Omega \mathbb G(x,y) f(y) dy. \]

The probabilistic approach provides in each of our cases a similar shape \[ \mathbb G(x,y) \asymp \frac{1}{|x-y|^{d-2s}} \left(1 \wedge \frac{\delta(x)}{|x-y|} \right)^\gamma\left(1 \wedge \frac{\delta(y)}{|x-y|} \right)^\gamma \]

Since we deal only with self-adjoint \(\mathcal L\), then \(\mathbb G(x,y) = \mathbb G(y,x)\).

The probabilistic approach provides in each of our cases a similar shape \[ \mathbb G(x,y) \asymp \frac{1}{|x-y|^{d-2s}} \left(1 \wedge \frac{\delta(x)}{|x-y|} \right)^\gamma\left(1 \wedge \frac{\delta(y)}{|x-y|} \right)^\gamma \]

And \(\gamma \in (0,1]\) depends on the setting

Numerics

Finite Differences

  • For the RFL and CFL we can re-use the weights of the whole space.

  • For the SFL: Make \(A\) numerical matrix for \(-\Delta\) problem and take \(A^s\): \[ \textrm{e.g. } A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & -1 & \\ -1 & 2 & - 1 \\ & \ddots & \\ &&-1&2 \end{pmatrix} \]

Finite Elements

Large solutions

Definition

By large solution we mean solutions that satisfy \[ \mathcal L u = F(x,u) \text{ in } \Omega \]

But that blow up on the boundary \[ u(x) \to \infty \text{ as } \mathrm{dist}(x, \partial \Omega) \to 0. \]

From now on

\[ \delta(x) = \mathrm{dist}(x, \partial \Omega) . \]

For the usual Laplacian

For the problems \[ -\Delta u + F(u) = 0 \]

Keller-Osserman condition:

Let \(f\) be continuous, \(F(0) = 0\) and \(F > 0\) otherwise,

then positive large solutions exist iff \[ \int_a^\infty \left( \int_0^t F(s) ds \right)^{-\frac 1 2} d t = \infty. \]

In radial coordinates this easy by shooting arguments

Canonical example: \(\Delta u = u^p\) with \(p > 1\).

Large solutions

The solution of the Laplace equation \[ \begin{dcases} \mathcal L u = f & \Omega \\ u = 0 & \partial \Omega \text{ or } \mathbb R^d \setminus \overline \Omega \\ \end{dcases} \qquad u(x) = \mathrm G[f] (x) = \int_\Omega \mathbb G(x,y) f(y) dy. \]

where \(\mathbb G(x,y) \asymp \frac{1}{|x-y|^{d-2s}} \left(1 \wedge \frac{\delta(x)}{|x-y|} \right)^\gamma\left(1 \wedge \frac{\delta(y)}{|x-y|} \right)^\gamma\)

(Abatangelo, GC & Vázquez, 2022) : \[ \mathrm G[\delta^\beta] \asymp \begin{dcases} \delta^\gamma & \beta +2s > \gamma \\ \delta^{\gamma} \log|\delta| & \beta +2s = \gamma \\ \delta^{\beta + 2s} & \beta +2s < \gamma \text{ and } \beta > -1-\gamma \\ \infty & \beta \le -1-\gamma \end{dcases} \]

Summary

\[ \mathrm G[\delta^\beta] \asymp \begin{dcases} \delta^\gamma & \beta +2s > \gamma \\ \delta^{\gamma} \log|\delta| & \beta +2s = \gamma \\ \delta^{\beta + 2s} & \beta +2s < \gamma \text{ and } \beta > -1-\gamma \\ \infty & \beta \le -1-\gamma \end{dcases} \]

Therefore, the relation \(\mathrm G[\delta^\beta] \asymp \delta^\alpha\) is

Large solution of the Dirichlet problem